Intelligent Design is not Creationism

I have been longing to see ANY type of empirical evidence over unguided process that evolutionists claim! There is NONE. All the evidence I have seen is shallow, stretched to the max, and not reliable at all. It is ridiculous. Thus why many scientists have turned to Design.

Design by a Creator is reality, not illusion. Some ID guys are Christians, but not all. ID does not claim who the Creator is. It just is reaching for something deeper than the Darwinism.

ID guys do not usually argue about the common descent.

ID is not based on religious texts.

For most ID guys, “God” is nature, for others, God is in nature.

Creation is separate in many ways! The Creator is identified intelligently as the Christian God of the Bible. Common descent is defeated in the Creation story line. And obviously, Creationism is based on religious text. Creationism will agree that evolutionists and Darwinists are off base in their arguments and this is why Darwinists and evolutionists claim that ID and Creationism are one and the same. THEY ARE NOT ONE AND THE SAME.

Darwinists will try to keep both ID and Creation OUT of the classroom and they will try to defeat both of us at the same time. Do not let them push the TRUTH down. As far as I am concerned let them defeat ID…we are not ID…we are Creationists! Do not let them group us into the same boat as ID!

2 thoughts on “Intelligent Design is not Creationism

  1. “I have been longing to see ANY type of empirical evidence over unguided process that evolutionists claim! There is NONE. All the evidence I have seen is shallow, stretched to the max, and not reliable at all. It is ridiculous. Thus why many scientists have turned to Design.”For the first part of your paragraph, I recommend actually learning some biology. As far as the last sentence is concerned: no they haven’t, and whoever told you that they did is a liar.

  2. Thanks for your comment sir.If you do not mind I wold like to respond. in my first post I was terribly vague (mostly because the first paragraph was not my main point or the post)and now I would like to add some links and biological evidence for you since you have asked.If evolution were true and all of the biological acts of evoltuion came to be as evolutionists proclaim than the earth would look a whole lot different. First off, there would be a lot more salt in the ocean. http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=56Second off the total population on earth would be much larger:If the first human pair lived 2,000,000 years ago, as the evolutionists claim, and the population has doubled itself in every 1612.51 years (one-tenth the Jewish rate of net increase), what would be the present population of the globe? Answer: 18,932,139,737,991 followed by 360 figures; or 18, 932,139,737,991 decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion; or 18,932,139,i37,991 vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion.http://www.manavai.com/n_articles_p15.htmThird, If evolution were true, then there would be millions of fossils that show the stages of evolution. the fossils are simply not there! http://www.evolutionsecrets.com/Plus there are tons of scientists in the recent years both “religiously motivated” (those don't count in your opinion I am sure) and plenty who are atheists who are skeptical of evolution, found it wrong and misguided. http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/about.php http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=660Ahttp://answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s